Astrophotography is a different kind animal. It requires multiple long exposures of a single target. It requires special adapters to couple a DSLR to the telescope. It requires clear skies - dark skies. The darker, the better. And let's not forget that the object you're wanting to snag on "film" has to be visible. Star charts have to be consulted to find the exact position in the sky - especially those not visible with the naked eye. After the images are collected, the processing begins. There's a lot to astrophotography - more than I realized when I started.
I've been taking advantage of every decent night I can, as long as my desired target(s) is/are available. Sometimes I'll stay up well past midnight, sometimes I'll be up at 4:00 in the morning. I welcome Winter and the longer nights. Getting back to Standard Time will be a blessing, too. I won't lose as much sleep.
Here are some samples of my work.
The Orion Nebula (M42) and smaller Nebula above/left (M43). |
The Lagoon Nebula. |
The Great Nebula in Andromeda (Andromeda Galaxy) and smaller galaxy below/right - M110. |
The Pleiades (Seven Sisters). |
The moon is an exception to the above routine. It can be done quite suitably with a single frame.
Very nearly full Moon. |
Apennine mountain range and Apollo 15 Landing site. |
I will post more about my spacey adventures as I have something to post. Winter will afford me more opportunities with the colder, drier air and longer nights - if the clouds cooperate.
-Dale
I love space. I've wanted a telescope for a long, long time and want a good one, prob. one like you have. I looked at one the other day, think it was on Amazon and thought that'd be the one I'd want, w/ computer tracking and camera mount. It was $30,000, though. -sigh- Even if I could afford that, I bet I'd accidentally knock it over or drop it.
ReplyDeleteDon't feel bad. A little $30,000 one is a bit out of my ball park, too. One like that is more likely to knock *you* down. :)
ReplyDelete